How should a QMHP establish accepted measures of service and recovery outcomes?

The choice to obtain approval from the consumer and the treatment team is the most valid approach for a Qualified Mental Health Professional (QMHP) to establish accepted measures of service and recovery outcomes. This collaborative process is essential as it ensures that the outcomes are not only relevant to the client's needs but also reflect the perspectives and goals of all parties involved in the treatment process.

Involving the consumer fosters a sense of ownership in their recovery journey, empowering them to actively participate in decision-making regarding their treatment goals. The treatment team’s input allows for a comprehensive understanding of the client’s condition and the effectiveness of service delivery. This collaborative approach aligns with best practices in mental health care, which emphasize person-centered treatment and shared decision-making.

On the other hand, determining outcomes unilaterally ignores the crucial input from both the consumer and the treatment team, potentially leading to irrelevant or ineffective measures. Keeping outcomes confidential does not promote transparency or collaboration, which are key components of effective treatment and recovery. Focusing solely on state regulations may overlook the unique needs of the consumer and a thorough understanding of their experience, leading to a less effective service outcome. Thus, integrating the perspectives of both the consumer and the treatment team creates a more effective framework for measuring service and recovery outcomes.